Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Aizman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Diana Aizman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobio of lawyer with no indication of notability per WP:BIO. Hunting for her online, I can find brief quotes from her in notable publications on controversial cases, some of which she has been involved with, but I can find no significant, in-depth coverage of her online from WP:Reliable sources. OnionRing (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No real claim of notability. Only claim is "Aizman has appeared on national news outlets". Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  02:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a lot of coverage at all here. Fails GNG.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 02:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I would've frankly simply PRODed, nothing convincing at all for any independent notability, having news attention is still not a guarantee for an acceptable article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.