Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Evangelista


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I do not userfy articles, but other admins may.  Sandstein  20:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Diana Evangelista

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested Prod. Some sources have been added since but the subject still fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Specific concerns with the suitability of the sources are:


 * ligafemenil.mx - this is a primary source and not suitable to support GNG
 * diariodecolima.com - this is a very brief article that does nothing other than confirm she plays for Monterrey
 * elcomentario.ucol.mx - this is a primary source and not suitable to support GNG as it is the newspaper of the university she attends, Universidad de Colima
 * afmedios.com - this is a very brief routine match report about a game she played at the World Student Games. She's mentioned very briefly and there is essentially nothing of significance that could be used to build an encyclopedic article.
 * primeraplanamx.com this does contain some content that could be used to support GNG, but a quarter of the article is concerned with the WSG team selection.
 * afmedios.com another very brief article that notes only a few games she plays in and confirms participation in the WSG. There is nothing of significance here that has not been dealt with in sources above (I'm not sure why we have four sources confirming WSG participation anyway).
 * excelsior.com.mx - this is a routine match report. The player is mentioned by name only. This is the definition of trivial coverage
 * fmfstateofmind.com - This is a routine match summary. The player is mentioned by name only. This is the definition of trivial coverage again. Fenix down (talk) 09:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comments This article was tagged for deletion on January 5 along with 60+ other articles about women players in this top-level women's league by Fenix down, the same editor nominating here on January 13. Myself and a few other editors who work in the area of women's football/soccer have been going through the mass deletion attempt and adding references and expanding content. I would agree this one is not quite ready to meet WP:GNG as is. There seems to be a rush to delete it though, so (or closing editor) if you'll be kind enough to userfy this article to my userspace, I'll work on improving it further when more time allows. Thanks. Hmlarson (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't believe there is a realistic chance of this indinitial passing GNG in the near future. Im not sure of the benefits of userfying at this stage. I'm not prepared to userfy but am a happy to abide by whatever consensus is achieved here. Fenix down (talk) 23:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Request Will the closing editor here please userfy this article or move to draft so it can be improved? Hmlarson (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy or move to draft. I have no idea how successful Liga MX Femenil has been in gathering media attention, but the inaugural season began in July 2017, so there has been very little time to know if these players will pass WP:GNG and whether this could be a future WP:SNG, which would be better based on WP:N rather than $$. I'm not comfortable with an attempted mass deletion of articles on athletes who are all women in Mexico, as I have concern about WP:Systemic bias. It doesn't cost anything to let the articles mature for a while, particularly if there is a group of editors who are willing to work on them. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Google News results for Liga MX Femenil. Hmlarson (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the article is no where near passing the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.