Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Francis (peace activist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It's snowing! Geschichte (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Diana Francis (peace activist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A user submitted an edit request but the request and the article lacked reliable sources. I tried to find some, but my search produced two short reviews for her book  and no biographical or professional profiles in reliable sources. This fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as she has not received significant coverage. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

The Friend (Quaker magazine) 1/10/2015 pp15-17 Interview of Diana Francis by Ian Kirk-Smith following her delivery of the Swarthmore lecture: Faith, Power and Peace. Thanks for your contribution, David Eppstein. Vernon White '''. . . Talk'''
 * Keep. I added to the article ten published reviews, including at least two for three of her books (also correcting the title of one, which may have made it more difficult to find its reviews). I think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Here is another reference - but I have forgotten how to enter things correctly:
 * Keep As per above passes WP:AUTHOR. Sliekid (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Reviews cited in the article (Thanks David Eppstein!) demonstrate Francis meets WP:NAUTHOR (criteria 3).
 * Keep seems to pass WP:AUTHOR. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above; also, everybody claims to be a "peace activist" but not everyone has given a Swarthmore Lecture. Bearian (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as the article has been improved with referencing to coverage in multiple reliable sources such as secondary independent reviews so WP:NAUTHOR is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.