Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana González


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 03:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Diana González

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She fails WP:NFOOTBALL by never playing in a fully professional league or for a senior international team. WP:GNG is failed due to the main coverage being after her death. Dougal18 (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I would agree that GNG is probably met in this instance, but allowing more time for a clearer consensus to emerge.
 * Weak keep - I appreciate GNG concerns but I think it is met. GiantSnowman 17:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has enough reliable sources coverage as shown in the article to pass WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article about semi-pro footballer and Mexico youth international that is the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of the coverage relates to her untimely death, but there is coverage of her brief career before that. Jogurney (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Don't see how GNG is met here. --BlameRuiner (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep She passes WP:GNG and has enough coverage. Abishe (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above also suggest the nom refer to WP:CONFUSESTUB. Mr. Apollo (talk to me bebe) 12:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.