Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Luke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Diana Luke

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article reads like a promotional piece for a radio presenter who appears to have done nothing notable other than appear on the radio (and also advertises her therapy business). This is content suitable for a radio fan site but not an encyclopedia. Flip Format (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Keep: No it doesn't. It has independent references and there's no issue with notability. And it doesn't advertise her therapy business. And I have removed some of the more advertising elements, not that there were any in the first place. Rillington (talk) 12:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC). Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, United Kingdom,  and Canada. Flip Format (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I find pieces she's reported on (and the most recent from 2016), but no notable sources about her. Almost promotional. Oaktree b (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the ones I found are for American people, nothing about this UK person. Oaktree b (talk) 19:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. Nothing found about her in a WP:BEFORE. SBKSPP (talk) 00:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per from. Fails WP:BIO and unable to find adequate information to justify keeping.  Skipple  ☎  12:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.