Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Speed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Diana Speed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No actual notability. Being a newsreader on BBC is insufficient for an article. No independent sources  DGG ( talk ) 00:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not NotableJadeslair (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a local non-notable news reader.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as certainly classic deletion material I would've also nominated, nothing at all convincing for any other solidity and notability apart from her localized journalism. SwisterTwister   talk  02:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable news announcer. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, there is a great deal more about her than you'd expect from this article which is highly recentist. However, I suspect for subjects who remain well known it is better to have no article at all than such a poor one. This will give someone the opportunity to create a balanced article without being burdened by what we have at present. Thincat (talk) 08:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep' The rationale given for the deletion smacks of elitism. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * In what way:the meaning was being a newsreader even on BBC ... . Some jobs in any profession require more creativity than others, and the description here sounds like   the bootom of the pyramid. And, more important as WP traditionally sees it, there's no evidence that the world thinks otherwise.  DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Re:: Does a News presenter require less creativity? Is this wp:verifiable? 14:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Existing source isn't independent of the subject, and I can't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources to satisfy WP:BASIC from Google searches. Qwfp (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.