Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Vincent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep (Nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) Go   Phightins  !  18:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Diana Vincent

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm sure she is a wonderful person, but simply not notable. The only references cited to substantiate any element is her retail website, and the independent reference only leads to a product listing. This is a promotional entry, and a search of google produced no reference independently establishing any notability. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NRVE, WP:CREATIVE Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Note for an administrator - Based on the comments and actions below, I WP:WITHDRAWN--Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep I have found very strong RS, an art museum-hosted biography, which should form the basis of referencing the current article. There is another excellent RS biography on the American Jewelry Design Council site here. In addition to this, there is this book citation. These are three very strong sources which together are more than sufficient to support notability for this designer. Mabalu (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Article has been updated with sources and rewritten. Mabalu (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep There now seem to be sufficient sources and awards for notability. A good job of rewriting--the article has a much more encyclopedic tone than most of our articles on people in this and related professions.  DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.