Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Yesenia Alvarado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is she's not yet notable. I will draftify at the suggestion of as there's no reason not to. Star  Mississippi  14:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Diana Yesenia Alvarado

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable sculptures. The best press mention for her is this NYT article, but it is a trivial mention. Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment this article was created as a student assignment. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * as the associated WikiEd expert who may want to comment. Pam  D  10:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment thanks for the ping, . I agree this one isn't ready for mainspace yet; our preference is to move it to Draft space for someone else to work on in the future when the artist has more work covered in reliable sources. --LiAnna (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete It's WP:TOOSOON. Alvarado's most notable career accomplishment so far is probably the inclusion in the group show Shattered Glass at Jeffrey Deitch, but even Deitch notes that this is a show of emerging artists. Let's give artists enough time to create a body of work before we create articles about them. Vexations (talk) 15:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Significant coverage in reliable sources is missing - both in the article and via a BEFORE search. Therefore this BLP on an emerging sculptor does not meet WP criteria for GNG at this time. Also does not meet the NARTIST notability requirements either, perhaps in a few more years after this artist has had more exhibitions, reviews, awards, etc. I always find it a little sad when student editors' contributions are deleted, however WP has guidelines for notability that must be followed in any case. Netherzone (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does seem like WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this article is not notable and reliable sources are missing, based in WP:TOOSOON.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.