Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane, Duchess of Württemberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Diane, Duchess of Württemberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deposed monarchy cruft, her supposed claim to notability is based on membership of long deposed noble families, very little evidence that she is a successful writer or sculptor. PatGallacher (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is deposed monarchy cruft in the extreme, it mainly funtions to group together even more non-notable members of deposed royal families and says nothing of substance on any of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added new soruces and more information on her artistic and philanthropic pursuits and removed some of the uneccesary geneolgical information. --Richiepip (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richiepip. Also notable enough for a biography to have be written about her ‘ Diane de France, la princesse rebelle‘. - dwc lr (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep 'la princesse rebelle' - yes, the article looks fine (now - I haven't glanced on the previous versions), the notability seem o.k. and the sourcing is also o.k.
 * Keep Looking at some of the new content placed i believe she's notable enough again to warrant a page. --ThatBaileyLad (talk) 21:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep subject has a book written about her, for one thing. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, Although from a deposed monarch family but she has signs of notability. Alex-h (talk) 11:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as a major royal figure, has a book written about her. VocalIndia (talk) 06:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:GNG applies here. Good sourcing as well.BabbaQ (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's plenty of coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.