Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Falkenhagen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Diane Falkenhagen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP fails WP:NBIO. Article relies almost entirely on primary sources - external links at that, and has been doing so for almost a decade now. WP:BEFORE check failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep (see explanation for the change ). Caballero / Historiador⎌ 22:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely agree with the OP. It reads like a resume and fails to show any notability. Caballero / Historiador⎌


 * Keep I cleaned up the article and found plenty of good references about her and her work. I hope that will take a second look. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing your comments and following your leads have made me change my mind about my vote. Thanks for cleaning up the article and for pointing out to the coverage Falkenhagen has received, but you or someone else, may want to spend a bit more time with it. I still think the article fails to demonstrate its significance (GNG). Right from the first sentence, the reader should understand that Falkenhagen’s work is significant enough to justify its own WP entry. Caballero / Historiador⎌

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Post clean-up, I do think there is sufficient coverage to satisfy notability requirements. Tone is iffy, but just warrants additional clean-up, not removal. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.