Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Fisher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Diane Fisher

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced BLP which does not demonstrate notability Jonathunder (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without any documentation of notability, must delete. --Quartermaster (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as BLP violation, unless documentation is provided at once. —Carrite, Sept. 26, 2010.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Valid and compelling BLP concerns: it was tagged unsourced over a year ago. Lionel (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Unless "elder" is a much more significant post in MCC than other churches, some one who is merely an elder is clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.