Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Marie Disney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. JodyByak, yak, yak 19:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Diane Marie Disney

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

 Delete and merge Merge and redirect to Disney family. Subject is not notable per WP:BIO and WP:NN Strothra 19:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect due to lack of independent notability. Strothra, recall that delete & merge is not possible under the GFDL. --Dhartung | Talk 19:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Published author (if only "as told to"), planner of Walt Disney Family Museum, philanthropist -- Google search easily finds multiple published sources to satisfy WP:BIO criteria.--SarekOfVulcan 19:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - lack of independent notability. ~ JohnnyMrNinja {talk} 00:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relister's note: See also the recently closed Articles for deletion/Sharon Mae Disney (2nd nomination). Sandstein 06:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep (per SarekofVulcan) or Merge to the Disney familyJForget 17:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient notability. We have articles on people less notable than that. Wryspy 04:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The Google search I mentioned above should be for "Diane Disney Miller", as that's the name under which most recent coverage has used.--SarekOfVulcan 14:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. But need more citations. "She donated $5 million to US charities..." which is from...??? Also, I have requested a photo be put up since she's the only biological child of Walt Disney. Uranometria 22:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentGoogle search results are not generally a suitable proof of notability. --Strothra 22:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The count of the results don't prove notability: the multiple independent articles on her, her work with the museum, her work with the concert hall, etc., do, IMHO.--SarekOfVulcan 13:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.