Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Roberts Stoler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Diane Roberts Stoler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article sources are purely WP:SPS aside from one reference that has nothing to do with this person and does not establish WP:BIO. Article is full of WP:OR, which is not surprising given this is an obvious autobiography, likely written to promote her books on Amazon (which is also used as a reference). -War wizard90 (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: I've struck your !vote as it is implied by your nomination.  01:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Self-serving spammy and non-notable, I entirely agree with the nominator Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with the nominator too, there is nothing much to see here, just a few articles that are published in other normal websites. SamuelDay1 (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Without WP:SPS, fails WP:PROF. BakerStMD T&#124;C 13:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources from which to build a clean, non-promotional version. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.