Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Sex Addict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Diary of a Sex Addict

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO; found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and no RS reviews were found in a WP:BEFORE. Please note the Telegraph article is about Anthony Peck and not the film. The Film Creator (talk) 19:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete . You'd think a film with a title like that would at least get enough attention from the 50 Shades of Gray crowd to warrant more coverage, but I guess that's not the case. Only thing I found was a Digitally Obsessed review (a Diary of a Digital Addict, if you will), which I do not know if that's a reliable source or not. 👨x🐱 ( Nina Cortex x Coco Bandicoot ) 20:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Updating to Weak Delete Merge to Anthony Peck per TV Guide review provided below and the fact that this is a biopic of him. 👨x🐱 ( Nina Cortex x Coco Bandicoot ) 02:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment found a review at TV Guide  Donald D23   talk to me  20:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - the 1,800 word Telegraph article was reprinted in the National Post - Canada's second-largest national paper - available on Proquest as, though the text can be seen (as presumably a copyright violation) here. Yes, there's more about Anthony Peck than the movie, but given the movie is semi-autobiographical, that shouldn't be a surprise - there's certainly a lot more about the movie than the nominating statement suggests; the depth of articles about Anthony Peck do make one wonder why one or the other isn't notable (or both). Nfitz (talk) 00:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per TV Guide, Radio Times and a paragraph in this book (also printed in article form). There is also Digitally Obsessed. Geschichte (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The last couple !votes demonstrate that this film received enough coverage in secondary sources to meet WP:NFILM. --Zander251 (talk) 05:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.