Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of an undead teenager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Diary of an undead teenager

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

According to this book's Amazon.com entry it was was self published through Lulu.com and it receives no hits other than basic advertising in a Google search. As such, it does not meet the notability criteria set out at WP:BK and should be deleted. Please note that an attempt was made to nominate this for a prod deletion, but the template was removed by an IP editor. Nick-D (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Per my PROD on 26 March, which said " Does not appear to meet notability requirements; no reliable sources and I cannot find any." - I appreciate that attempts have been made to reference it, but one article in a local newspaper does not represent 'significant coverage' (see user:chzz/vrs); the other refs are just listings and primary source.  Chzz  ►  04:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete While a self-published book can be notable they usually are not. There is no indication this is one of the exceptions. Edward321 (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.