Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dice Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Dice Man. Redirect as originally recommended (non-admin closure) ( talk→  Bwilkins / BMW   ←track ) 12:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Dice Living
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I first redirected this to the book from which the term is drawn. That redirect was reverted, so I am bringing it here with a recommendation to redirect to The Dice Man. I believe the article as it stands today is Original Research and that the term is not notable per se, thus the article will not survive as an article about "Dice Living", and that the best service we can do is redirect it to the book. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. There's a possibility that this could develop into a worthwhile article if coverage of the subject not directly related to The Dice Man could be found, but at present I'm not convinced there's enough to justify a separate article. It should be noted that Rhinehart/Cockcroft wrote two other books on the same subject, a second novel and The Book of the Die: A Handbook of Dice Living, so a redirect to Luke Rhinehart is another option. --Michig (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect Per nom & Michig. I don't believe it is a notable term in its own right. Sources don't suggest otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddawkins73 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * redirect per nom. Don't think AfD was necessary, redirects should be detirmined on talk pages unless contorvertial.Yobmod (talk) 10:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.