Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dichroic LEDGlass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Dichroic LEDGlass

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sounds more like a advertise for a product made by a single company than a technology Craesh (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: OMG. The other article about LED glass is marginal, but this one is awful. - Frankie1969 (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A cursory google and google scholar search turns up nothing. It appears to be a newly developed material, but wikipedia is not a crystal ball; notability should be established now rather than inferring on future notability. I also note that both articles were created by the apparent originator of the term, this seems like a speedy delete G11 case; unambiguous advertising. IRWolfie- (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.