Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick But Legal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Dick But Legal
Neologism/protologism with no GHits; smacks strongly of WP:NFT (was deprodded anonymously by a school IP address), so sent for procedural AfD nomination. ~ Matticus78 14:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Delete. as the article says "Dick but Legal" is a neologism. If the article says it fails WP:NEO then who am I to argue? --Richhoncho 14:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not me; Delete per above. Ravenswing 16:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Gwernol 22:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 03:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.