Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Nasty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Dick Nasty

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possible failure of notability criteria. WP:PORNBIO states that actors must have been nominated for notable awards across multiple years, he has only been nominated for two awards in 2006. EuroPride (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Absolutely no opinion but what on earth does the nomination mean? Are some years more notable than others? Was 2006 a particularly not-notable year? Should we be nominating "2006" for deletion? AndyJones (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply - As I said, WP:PORNBIO states that the subject should have been nominated for awards across multipe years. This person was only nominated twice in the year 2006; not in multiple years. EuroPride (talk) 20:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I just noticed I had written "notable awards across notable years" instead of "notable awards across multiple years". Sorry. EuroPride (talk) 20:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PORNBIO as stated by nom. Further, "moderately well known for briefly appearing..." does not compensate. Johnuniq (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep passes BASIC and ANYBIO #1. High name recognition. Article needs work though. - Stillwaterising (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG - PORNBIO is depreciated. Hipocrite (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * (birth name}
 * (aka)
 * (aka)
 * (aka)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 15:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment PORNBIO is not deprecated quite yet. WP:ANYBIO may apply in this case in conjunction with his being in a mainstream documentary series Louis Theroux's Weird Weekends, and WP:GNG in his being written of in The X factory: inside the American hardcore film industry, Headpress: journal of sex, religion, death, and The Penthouse Erotic Video Guide, as well as a story The Economist.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This would appear to be a weak delete, although he may cross the inclusion line soon. Stifle (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No... not a "weak delete"... call it rather a Neutral comment that is hoped might encourage editors toward other considerations.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete News hits on Google are not relevant to the subject at hand. General Google search yields a profile on porn version of IMDb, video sites, among other stuff that is not relevant to this subject of the article.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 01:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.