Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Rodgers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to The Common Good (political party). No consensus to keep, no real consensus to delete. A redirect seems an appropriate compromise and if the article on the party gets deleted then this can go with it. Michig (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Dick Rodgers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Leader of a small political party. Only one primary source is in the article; I cannot find any reliable secondary sources which establish notability. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 08:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 08:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 08:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 08:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - definitely sources, but they're al in the party article. Clear pass of WP:GNG. StAnselm (talk) 09:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources you see are all local; it doesn't seem he has achieved more than local fame - and that's not enough per WP:BIO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 03:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: Leader of a party that has never gotten more than 198 votes in a municipal election and 1.4% of votes for a national-level seat. Appears to be a person of mainly local interest.  StAnslem above points out some articles that might get this subject up to WP:BIO; maybe my threshold for "multiple" sources in WP:GNG and BIO is becoming higher than others, so I'm saying weak delete instead of delete. --Closeapple (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Common Good (political party) or delete if the party comes to an end. The local newspaper coverage is all of the lovable eccentric type, and all in connection to the party he founded. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Common Good (political party). agree with ClarityFiend.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't pass GNG. No redirect as the party isn't notable in my opinion, i'm going to give it a run passed afd shortly. Szzuk (talk) 21:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.