Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Vermillion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Dick Vermillion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Being elected clerk of the Kentucky Court of Appeals once and no other office is far from satisfying WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NPOL does not extend an automatic notability freebie just because a role happens to have been elected rather than hired; the difference between a role that passes NPOL and a role that fails it hinges on the importance of the work the person does in the role, and court clerk is not an "inherently" notable role at all. But the only evidence of reliable source media coverage being shown here at all is a single obituary in his hometown newspaper, which is not in and of itself enough coverage to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold an NPOL-passing role. Bearcat (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete being the clerk of a court is not a notable position.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.