Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dickinson Valley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Dickinson Valley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionable notability and poorly sourced (one primary source). Sociable Song (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep It has sufficient notability, but i'am leaning toward to fail WP:NGEO. Sheldybett (talk) 10:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge or Delete not enough to seperate it out from McMurdo's dry valleys nor is it noted as being significant in the parent article. Fails WP:NGEO NealeFamily (talk) 06:39, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, that was a secondary source. I've cited the New Zealand Gazette for you now.  Compared to the amount of effort for, being able to rapidly lay one's hands on a source with the official name and location is a joy.  &#9786;  Absent a suitable merger location, which would probably be a table of these valleys with notes such as whom they are named after, I think that we should keep this, remembering the remit to incorporate a gazeteer and giving a slight pass to an officially named place in Antartica, albeit with a view towards merger as I mentioned.  No use of the administrator deletion tool is necessary, though. Uncle G (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There does not seem to be anything that makes this valley notable outside being one of the dry valley's and therefore would seem to be more appropriately incorporated into the article. NealeFamily (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.