Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dida Sportswear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Dida Sportswear

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Fails WP:ORG. Also, WP:INHERITORG fail.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  11:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete -Appears to be failing WP:CORPDEPTH. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  22:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: This formerly little-known company has received sufficient RS (much of it descendant from their winning the bid to supply India's Olympic uniforms -- a savvy marketing coup on their part given that country's burgeoning population).  Pax 13:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete:  WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORG disqualify.-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 15:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The Indian Express source has some depth, and if we had two like it this would be a weak keep, but I don't believe the Times of India source does, and I was strongly underwhelmed by what else I could find. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, fails WP:CORPDEPTH & WP:ORG. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.