Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didn't We Almost Have It All?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Additionally, no evidence to support nominator's claim that article was ever deleted or listed at DRV. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Didn't We Almost Have It All?

 * - (View Afd) (View log) Procedural nomination. Article was an overturned speedy from DRV. It is unclear if the article passes WP:PROF. No sources at the moment. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete episode shows no independent notability from the show itself. It is essentially an in-universe plot summary coupled with a short list of actors that appeared in it.  No evidence that this specific episode is unique or notable in any way.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  18:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Confused Is it just me or does the nomination not match the article? We have a television episode, the cited policy is for notability of academics, and the unless I'm missing it I don't see this article on the DRV page?--Cube lurker (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm not sure this was the intended article. If this is the article that was intended for nomination, please note that it cannot be closed with a delete, merge, or redirect consensus until further notice is received from ArbCom. However, if this was not the intended article, we can safely close it as a horribly malformed nomination. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's bizarre. This was never speedied and never on DRV, and WP:PROF is definitely all wrong, but the edit summary for the creation of this discussion page says to see Grey%27s_Anatomy_episodes_%28Season_3%29, which is certainly duplicate content. --Dhartung | Talk 09:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep but hack the plot section to death (aka cleanup) This article would meet the standards set by other articles of the same type if the plot section were about ¼ as long as it is now. Cut that down, toss in some references (which can't be difficult to find for something like this), and it'll be fine. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is an episode of television series notable enough to have an article, (although I have no idea what the nominator is talking about. The first 3 sentences of the nom appear to be nonsense.) --Pixelface (talk) 02:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Unlike many TV episodes, the season finale of Grey's Anatomy generated--surprize!--some actual press coverage here. Blast Ulna (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't need a separate article. Merge into Grey's Anatomy episodes (Season 3). Bearcat (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup - Per Blast Ulna's sources and the many (I'm sure) other sources that are out there for this episode. It was a fairly big deal within the show's history as well as the entire real-life "faggot" controversy surrounding Washington's departure from the series. -- Y&#124;yukichigai (ramble   argue  check ) 03:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * keep per Blast Ulna. C'mon people, is a season finale and has lots of independent press talking about the episode and reactions to it. Ulna has only only given a fraction of that coverage. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep due to coverage in multiple reliable third-party sources. Season finales of recognizable shows are notable.  Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 18:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.