Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die: Roll to Proceed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Die: Roll to Proceed

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable play or whatever, from a non-notable entertainment organization. The organization is up for speedy deletion, but there is apparently no speedy deletion criteria for plays. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 04:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 7.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  05:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  03:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete already. Sources are not reputable, no notability asserted at all. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not finding the reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After searching, not finding coverage for this topic in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Do not delete, needs polishing - Saw this on Broadway World today, http://broadwayworld.com/article/Interactive-Comedy-DIE-Roll-to-Proceed-to-Begin-Run-at-The-Red-Room-330-20120228, this source is valid. Other sources in article need verifying or deleting however.Broadwaycritic2009 (talk) 19:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.