Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Tür ist zu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Die Tür ist zu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the only notable publication I can find on this is the Allmusic review, and one publication isn't enough to ensure Wikipedia notability Lachlan Foley (talk) 04:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Why isn't one publication enough? At worst redirect to Swans discography as a possible search term.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 12:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Swans discography. Encyclopedic information that we should keep somewhere. --Michig (talk) 19:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC) It is also covered by Trouser Press here. --Michig (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Question Why delete instead of redirect? This user has created about a dozen of these album deletion requests and has yet to explain why they should be deleted and not simply redirected. Note that if they are redirected, the categories should remain and r from album should be added. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has secondary sources, EPs are still notable.--Soul Crusher (talk) 20:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.