Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego 2/X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by Amatulic. (CSD G3: blatant hoax). This seems a case where an IAR closure, despite my having commented in the discussion, seems reasonable, but anyone who disagrees is welcome to reopen it. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Diego 2/X

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A hoax. Another editor removed the CSD tag saying it was "not a significant enough deception." There is no record in Japanese or in English that this show even existed. As a hoax, it is a poor one because the Japanese title given is incorrect (it actually says "San Diego" not "Diego") and the number of episodes is far too many for a TV Tokyo year-long show. Should be speedily deleted. Michitaro (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I tend to agree that it's a hoax, my searching isn't turning up anything. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Given that I edit the Anime News Network encyclopedia, moderate the forums for FUNimation and live in the UK I think I have the confidence to say without a shred of research that no such thing exists, at least not as the infobox presents it. There's also the little fact that 4Kids went bankrupt before this is supposed to have started airing. Shiroi Hane (talk) 00:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely unverifiable. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * As a Google search fails to find any relevant hits whatsoever (even those oh-so unreliable speculation), I can pretty much say that is article is a complete hoax. As such, I recommend that we speedy delete this article. If not speedy, then as snow delete, since I just can't see how this (possible) hoax has a snowball's chance in hell of lasting on Wikipedia. We don't needs hoaxes here, except for articles about actual hoaxes. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * In fact, I've gone ahead and re-tagged it as G3. Feel free to decline the speedy if needed, but since the article's practically confirmed to be a hoax already, it shouldn't have an article, and should be deleted ASAP. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.