Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Fontanive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Diego Fontanive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Most of the sources provided are primary (e,g. ), irrelevant, or adverts. A WP:BEFORE search indicates they have made little or no impact in coverage by reliable sources (GScholar, GBooks, or GNews, for example), certainly not of the depth or persistence required to pass WP:ANYBIO. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  14:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks very promotional and hardly notable --  Brookie :) { - like the mist - there  one moment and then gone!}  (Whisper...) 14:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I can't find anything in Gbooks, Gsearch, Gnews -- Gnews has results on a minor football player of the same name. The Cambridge e-Learnning Institute (sic; yes that's how it's spelled in the disclaimer on their webpage, "learnning"), has no affiliation with the university of the same name. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant PROMO that is unsupported by any acceptable sources. Agricola44 (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.