Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Fusaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Diego Fusaro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Primary sources person that clearly fails to meet wp:notability guideline. Govindaharihari (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Govindaharihari (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Comment Delete. GS h-index of 4 looks like WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete When an article tells us what level of honors an academic got for their PhD it is not a good sign. At least in the subject of history of philosophy it generally takes quite some time to make a significant impact enough to fulfill academic criteria 1. Fusaro has not reached that point.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep -- I'd be loath to delete an article on the subject that has an it.wiki article: Diego Fusaro. WorldCat shows some publications: link. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete NN person, Italian wiki page is just a vanity page with anything concrete. Also, the page was created by a paid editor. 151.53.30.131 (talk) 11:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't have the independent coverage required by WP:GNG. I don't see notable accomplishments to overcome that. 2601:248:4500:9523:43C:32C0:AC8B:3F10 (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per discussion above. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete quote discussion above. Furthermore also the discussion for deletion of the Italian page was superficial and probably lead by fans rather than average impartial users. --AlanGiulio (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   07:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.