Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dielog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Dielog

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about a supposed "international movement," although attempts to confirm this via Google produce nothing. The article does not meet WP:N or WP:RS standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No outside refs, no news hits, no reliable sources found. The Lien Foundation might be notable -- it's got a few news mentions -- but Dielog isn't.  Graymornings (talk) 03:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

you can try to check dielogue... it's linked to the actual life before death campaign. The site dielogue.org, dielog.org is basically the same movement... its a defination of what it is... a conversation about death, or the dying. A movement is also defined by the people... and its a concept. I don't understand why a certain concept cannot be accepted in wikipedia. It will only add value... you can define what dielog is on your own terms...

please revert your deletion statement. there is really no reason why you should not consider such a noble cause as futile.

thanks... pastor.

hi pastor and wikipedia team ... i added 2 reference and some definitions of what will possibly work for the article. Just to state that dielog and dielogue are the same thing, just different in spelling only... its something totally meaningful and you should also be part of this as well... please add what is your definition of DIELOG in the page and start contributing your story to the movement. I'm sure you have much to say about death and the dying...

thanks and regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadbard (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, I can't find much in terms of notability for the different spelling. It may be a noble cause, but it first has to gain widespread attention before it merits a Wikipedia article. Check out our notability guidelines for more details. You might also find this page on how to create your first article helpful.  Graymornings (talk) 22:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info... I added the ref for Die-logue... and some new definition on the page. One notable one was by a Minister in Singapore... will that qualify? I've read the page on how to create your first article. Thanks... DIELOG, Dielogue, Die-logue is not something out of thin air... its a serious subject with real people behind this. Thanks again for your consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.24.247.102 (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. The links provided don't make it clear that there's a movement, per se. Plus, they're all related-party links. In the absence of independent coverage, delete. —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete There's [no third party coverage] for this 'movement'. Hazir (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.