Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dienekes Pontikos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. NJA (t/ c)  09:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Dienekes Pontikos

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The notability of this individual is in question. Spring and Port Wine (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure why you removed the speedy, at the moment there is no claim to notability at all. Speedy delete unless someone comes up with something. Hairhorn (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indeed, Hairhorn has a point - there is no assertion that the individual is notable. It's possible that something in the external link, which I note is not independent of the subject, might give an indication, but I'm not seeing it. If the subject were published in journals, or if there were articles in news media that discussed the subject, then we might have something. Again, no sources are apparent. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as containing no plausible assertion of notability, without prejudice to recreation. This is his anthropology blog going back to 2003—I dunno, but it reads like real anthropology.  Is he notable?  That I can't tell, but I'd like to give the author (or any later author) an opportunity to create an article credibly asserting notability in the future without immediate "speedy delete per deletion discussion" tagging.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC). EDITED TO ADD [ http://www.stormfront.org /forum/showthread.php?t=43774 this thread] from Stormfront (!) led me to this article by Pontikos, called "Against Arthur Kemp’s "March of the Titans: The History of the White Race."  Any relation to the "Arthur Hemp" who created this article?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.