Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dienstagische Kurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Die Kuranten. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Dienstagische Kurant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no indication that this German-language website is notable. The article is also extremely misleading. The website uses the name of the Tuesday edition of the first ever Yiddish-language newspaper, published 1686 to 1688 in Amsterdam (assumed years by issues found). Our article attempts to mislead readers to think that their news source has been 332 years around. Not really. We do have an article on the original Dienstagische Kurant, under Die Kuranten. I suggest first deleting our promotion article then creating a redirect to Die Kuranten as the correct replacement. gidonb (talk) 03:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect I couldn't find any secondary sources for the website, which has barely been updated in the last year and doesn't appear to be an active periodical? SportingFlyer  talk  06:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions as "Miscellany for deletion". gidonb (talk) 13:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect. Have not been able to find much at all regarding the website in my BEFORE.Icewhiz (talk) 13:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per nom. Yoninah (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect, this is somewhat promotional and the disengenuous connection of the contemporary and 17th century paper fails WP:V. Smmurphy(Talk) 21:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No refs, a bit spammy. L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.