Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diesel Loco Shed, Visakhapatnam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sourcing presented by User:Thryduulf convinces me that this subject passes WP:GNG and that there are likely more sources out there. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 00:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Diesel Loco Shed, Visakhapatnam

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence seems to be available to indicate that this is actually a notable subject for an article. Fram (talk) 12:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to evaluate sources and edits since nomination. Note that the "substantial edits by others" would disqualify this article from a WP:G5 deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep from 2 minutes on google I've found the following sources:, , , , , and . It's also very likely that there are offline sources and sources not in English. I am unconvinced the nominator made a serious attempt at a WP:BEFORE here. Thryduulf (talk) 12:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, revenge posts, always fun. First source you give is not independent at all, so not valid for notability. Similarly, your last source isn't independent either, it's from the national academy of Indian railways. I am unconvinced the !voter has a good knowledge of WP:GNG and WP:RS. Fram (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What on earth has revenge got to do with anything? And that's still 5 sources I found in 2 minutes that you agree demonstrate notability, which rather backs up that any WP:BEFORE you did was at best inadequate. Thryduulf (talk) 17:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note user:JJking56 removed the AfD message from this page, I've restored it but don't have time to look whether they've done the same for the other similar nominations (which I've not looked at yet). Thryduulf (talk) 12:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per references above (which should be added to article). Djflem (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete made by a sock. Leomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!)  02:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Would like to see this kept for the railfan community, but the sources used don't seem to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.