Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diesel ebooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Diesel ebooks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

After a quick search, I can't really find any good references for this company other than their website. I feel, however, that based on the rather large (and perhaps erm, true?) claims this article makes, that it doesn't qualify for CSD A7. Levinge (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - only press seems to be a few press releases, and even those aren't widely distributed. A few mentions in non-reliable sources, but nothing significant, and really no RS coverage that I can dig up. I can't find anything to back their claim, nor do I really understand what an "independent" eBook store is anyway. Zachlipton (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unless good referencing appears. I think they mean they belong to one person, and are not a big company like B & N and Amazon. Peridon (talk) 22:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 06:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.