Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dietmar Streitler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 00:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Dietmar Streitler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete Not enough notability.  It's got one source about one thing that happened, and nothing else.  If this is a notable sentence, the article itself isn't notable enough. Le Panini (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep This passes WP:NOLYMPICS - Simeon (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  07:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  07:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  07:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  07:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per Simeon, the subject passed WP:NOLY-- ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 09:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as a straight-up pass of WP:NOLYMPICS. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as Olympians are notable. Also, took two minutes to expand to include appearances at two World Championships and a European Championships. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 10:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable wrestler. Passes WP:NOLYMPICS. Priyanjali singh (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep It's pretty clear this passes WP:NOLYMPICS and as such the article has almost zero chance of being delete. That said, I can understand where the nominator is coming from with the lack of sourcing. It's unfortunate that the notability guidelines about athletes aren't stricter about it, personally I don't think every single Olympian in history should automatically notable, but they are what they are. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He obviously meets WP:NOLYMPICS. While I do agree with Adamant1 that I've seen articles that meet WP:NOLYMPICS that seem to fail to meet WP:GNG, I don't think a 5th place Olympic finish can be ignored.  I don't feel the same about someone who comes in 78th. Papaursa (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Delete . Per discussion below, it seems safe to presume they satisfy WP:GNG and/or WP:SPORTSBASIC.  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 23:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You have pretty high standards if you believe finishing 5th at the Olympics does not meet WP:SPORTSBASIC. I would claim it's a more significant achievement that playing in a pro soccer game or one MLB game. Papaursa (talk) 01:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I find it difficult to compare these two, as a player in a professional soccer team participates in multiple games over many years, whereas an olympic is a few months. If you literaly meant one game, I'd definitely vote to delete them if notability was temporary and restricted to the game they participated in.  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 01:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it's also important to remember that he competed before the internet and it's quite likely that there was significant coverage of him in Austria over the years when he was a competitor at various European and world championships, as well as at the Olympics. Papaursa (talk) 02:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, per WP:NEXIST. Your arguments, and my further investigation of the notability guidelines, convinced me. I changed my vote. Best,  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 18:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.