Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Differences between book and film versions of Timeline

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

per WP:OR Chris! ct 02:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete At best these types of articles are uninteresting collection of trivia; of course the versions are going to differ between media. At worst these articles bleed off the few facts notable enough to have a citation from the main articles. Merge any sourced differences to the main articles. SolidPlaid 03:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research and very trivial. RobJ1981 13:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see it as trivia at all. These are big differences, and important aspects of comparative literature and deconstruction. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Please see Articles for deletion/Harry Potter film/book differences (2nd nomination) for similar precedent. Chris! ct 20:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - OR.  AK Radecki Speaketh  03:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge and redirect without deleting to the film article on Timeline. The information can be easily verified by reading the book and watching the film and I have actually gone to articles on films curious about how it differed from the book.  Considering that people have also created articles on this kind of information, no real need to cut it.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 04:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (merge content as needed & redirect to relevant articles) per WP:N and WP:NOT (2.9). --lquilter 19:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.