Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digeponics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Digeponics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a commonly used term. The paper cited as the sole reference here has been cited only once a/c Google Scholar.In addition, Google shows another paper about it by the same authors. There are a few scattered refs in the web. The name seems to have been used as a company name,  DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  17:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete this neologism per WP:NOTDICT. Pburka (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a word coined to describe a small-scale, demonstration pilot. No evidence that the concept or the word has caught on.Glendoremus (talk) 05:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Appears to be a term invented by the authors of the paper, identified as the sole  source, with little other coverage, so fails the GNG. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and I'm not convienced that this would even make it into wikitionary. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 21:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and policy, especially WP:NEO and WP:SIGCOV. This word has not "taken off" yet. Bearian (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree, neologism that is not yet notable. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with above reasoning.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   13:36, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.