Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digestion of the protein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 04:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Digestion of the protein

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnecessary split from Protein (nutrient) as per CFORK. PROD removed so raising for further discussion. Fæ (talk) 22:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 21:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 22:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Protein metabolism. There is some potentially good information here once it is sourced and moved from its current awkward location. Jminthorne (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * merge - concur with Jminthorne. This is not an article, but a section of one. Protein metablolism looks like a viable home for merger. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Who would ever use this as a search term? What part of this isn't covered in the appropriate articles? As for a redirect target, digestion seems like a good choice. Shadowjams (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with Proteolysis. Not exactly a content fork to Digestion. Check other articles created by the same user (someone transformed them to redirects).Biophys (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: I have relisted this as there is more than 1 choice for merging outcome, plus deletion !votes - maybe a further week's discussion will reach a consensus on whether it should be deleted, or where it should be merged to
 * Delete. Uncited and poor choice of article name anyway.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  17:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Protein catabolism. The article content is currently at Protein digestion, which is clearly a better title (watch out for that doube redirect, closing admin). The content is most appropriate for Protein catabolism, which deals specifically with the breakdown of proteins via intra- and extra-cellular processes.&mdash; Scientizzle 22:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge. The quantity of info in "Protein catabolism" is small. "Protein catabolism" could reasonably be regarded as a spinout article from "Protein metabolism". Given the lack of info in "Protein catabolism", it would be better to merge the info into "Protein metabolism". Axl  ¤  [Talk]  06:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. If the content was better, it could have been merged to Protein catabolism or Proteolysis, but definitely not to Protein metabolism, since that article covers synthesis as well as digestion. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing worth merging.I would have speedy deleted this as A10. This is a very weak article that simply naïvely duplicated existing good content. The actual term is notreally English, and does not need a redirect either.   DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.