Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diggy Simmons (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Diggy Simmons
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dubious notability. Sources are not significant or independent. No real notability; just being the son of a rapper doesn't mean that he is automatically notable. Ei1sos (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - If you read the article a bit you would see that he was just more than the son of a rapper. Candy  o32  - Happy New Year :) 20:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No doubt, as Candyo32 suggests, the subject is more than the son of a rapper. Whatever he is, though, he doesn't meet either the GNG or any other notability criteria.  The nom in the previous AfD hit the nail right on the head: the subject's claim to fame is a reality show (on which article he's already prominently featured) and several mixtapes that haven't charted or have gone into national rotation.  That he was in a commercial is scarcely notable (given that the vast number of commercial actors are never even named), and presuming the allegation that Atlantic Records has signed him is true, that isn't notable either.  What part of WP:BAND does anyone allege he meets?   Ravenswing  21:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Run's House. He may become notable in the future now that he signed to a label.  But in the meantime, Run's House has a short bio on him which makes it a good target for a redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 14:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete and redirect to Run's House. Since the last nom there was no substantial change and I still don't see the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO addressed or the GNG. Again no prejudice against recreation if something charts or a release attracts substantial coverage. Hekerui (talk) 16:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.