Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigiBLAST


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  04:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

DigiBLAST

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomination per Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_6. It has been asserted that this article's subject does not meet GNG. signed,Rosguill talk 04:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 04:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 04:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is some coverage like . What is already too little for WP:GNG is also just WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. The product does not appear to be notable. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 06:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. The console does not look something special/notable. Its library does have some notable releases but they are just the ported version from the other platforms. Plus look at the cited sources. Ref #1 links to the main page of Gamasutra. Source #2-12 are some search results from PEGI website. Source #13 is from Gizmodo and it is OK but not enough.  Wario-Man  talk 10:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. I could locate no significant RS.4meter4 (talk) 00:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.