Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digimon Wrestling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Digimon Wrestling
Fiction? Manga/anime cruft? Unreferenced. No recognisable Google hits. -- RHaworth 08:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN - talks about a 10 foot tall kid.... Come on guys, wake up! Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 16:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Nahh... Delete. Too long for BJAODN. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  16:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a real organization. It really exits. Now obviousy it's written with some funny sarcasm mixed in, but it is based on truth. The DWWE is an organization that exists in Jacksonville, FL. There are four current members.
 * Delete as unverifiable. Please read up on WP:V and WP:RS. Clubs like this are generally not material for an encyclopedia. - Mgm|(talk) 11:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Also see User:Uncle G/Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. - Mgm|(talk) 11:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as recreation of previously-deleted content. (I can't find the article in the AFD archive, but I'm quite certain it was here, probably sometime in October or November. Would someone with better search skills care to back me up on this one?)Regina0613 20:12, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/DWWE, perhaps? Delete.--Apostrophe 00:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Retain this article rules, DIGIMONS ARE AWESOME!


 * This article is based on fact and therefore doesn't violate WP:V. This is shown by the title history placed at the bottom. This does not violate WP:RS due to us giving a source.


 * Beware of sockpuppets! Since the "article" is written in the first person, delete as vanity. First person articles do not belong in Wikipedia. Also, nn per (from above discussion) There are four current members and we really do fight for paper belts. B.Wind 01:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Retain because isn't Wikipedia a site to spread knowledge on through sharing our own knowledge with the world? That's what I believe, so If this is a true organization, which I feel it is due to the history being way to long to sit and create from just imagination, it should be kept to spread the knowledge of this organization. No information deserves to be thrown from our site with out extensive reasoning that would deem it fake because no true knowledge is insignificant.
 * This anon user has voted twice and has only contributed to this article. --Apostrophe 18:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 14:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.