Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digit magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Digit magazine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable magazine, reads more like an advert than anything encyclopaedic Blowdart | talk 17:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's hard (though admitedly, not impossible) to establish notability in less than 24 hours. Un  sch  ool  17:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gamos Technology Solutions though I am doubtful about the notability of the target page. TerriersFan (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, been pondering what to do about GTS. There's a slight claim to notability in their game in a local language, but not much else. It doesn't help it was created by the company founder either. --Blowdart | talk 17:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. I expect the magazine will achieve notability, but I can't see any way that it is there yet. Tim Ross   (talk)  17:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete db-web. Web content with no indication nor assertion of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - ad for new magazine, clearly not (yet) notable. Gandalf61 (talk) 11:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.