Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digitag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 03:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Digitag

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Non notable neoglism. Prod removed by author without comment. I also declined a speedy of it having no context- it does have context, it just doesn't deserve an article. J Milburn (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KathrynLybarger (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I did a google search and didn't find any hits that used the term in this way, so thought it had no context to narrow down what it was talking about. Is this term used in a particular culture?  Office?  Forum?  However, "non-notable neologism" is a much more convincing argument. KathrynLybarger (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NEO. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  21:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 22:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mh29255 (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I also could not find any instance of this word being used in this way. Seems like original research to me.Beeblbrox (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.