Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigitalOcean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

DigitalOcean

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was speedy deleted, and the deletion was contested at deletion review. As a result of that review, I'm bringing it to AfD, so a proper consensus can be reached. This is an administrative action; I offer no opinion on the outcome. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm happy with the work has done to bring this article up to scratch. It has had mentions in several major publications, including most recently here. Jamesx12345 14:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: The subject is notable per the sources cited and there are no problems in the article as it stands. This version is not promotional and I declined a G11 nomination for that reason. BethNaught (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Full disclosure, I started the article, but I just want to note a few things. In terms of notability, the article had been created twice before I created it. Since my article was also speedy-deleted and I recreated it, it has now been created 4 times now. Regarding NPOV, I have no relation to the company, I'm not even a customer, just a potential customer looking for NPOV information. With regards to the original deletion review, let me leave a link to the discussion and note that even my speedy deleter, User:Deb, has revisited the article and edited it. Niels Olson (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep As far as I'm concerned, now that the promotional wording has been amended, this is okay. Deb (talk) 10:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm seeing secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.