Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Asset Holdings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Digital Asset Holdings

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  HighKing++ 11:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: I was somewhat surprised at this AFD, but concur that most coverage is passing mentions and very skimpy; I don't know of any deep dives. I'll have a look around - David Gerard (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * So, in googling "Digital Asset Holdings" and financial papers, I found: FT: This talks about the company a bit.  Newsblog post talking about DAH pivoting away from blockchain.,  Blythe Masters leaving DAH, some discussion of the company.  Initial deal with ASX. NYT:  Masters joins.  Fundraising issues. Bloomberg:  Masters leaves. I'd think that's enough actual WP:CORPDEPTH to write something useful. So I'll say keep ... though I'm not sure I'm going to write anything myself, the sources exist - David Gerard (talk) 12:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per David.  H iddenL emon  //  talk  09:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.