Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Bhojpuri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted A7 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Digital Bhojpuri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article on a recently-launched Wordpress blog, sourced only to its own site and social media pages. Searches, including specifically on Indian newspapers, are finding no reliable 3rd party coverage on this blog. (Note that there is a "Bhojpuri Digital" commercial streaming site, but that appears unconnected.) A CSD A7 was declined so I am bringing this to AfD: fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, my first impression, and possibly Graeme Bartlett's too, was that this is actually a TV news channel, which would make it ineligible for A7. At a closer look I agree with AllyD that it's a blog, clearly within the scope of A7 as web content (or arguably an organization, also covered by A7). Pinging Graeme Bartlett for reconsideration or an explanation why this wouldn't be in the scope of A7. Huon (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes I considered this a TV channel. I should take another look to see if it actually broadcasts or not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Even the references were dead end links. I saw a similarly named web page, which is only web content, confirming not a real TV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.