Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Entertainment Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Digital Entertainment Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:CORP. a minor now defunct company. gets a few minor hits, and I note references 9-16 are small mentions. part of the article is a content fork talking about the criminality of its founder. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - I'll do some digging for references. DEN had a major presence in the digital entertainment space during the early dot com days.  The article (if the sources can be found) wouldn't be flattering; they staffed up with prominent executives, built very expensive offices, offered ridiculous perks, and burned through millions of dollars without generating any revenue in a short period of time.  And that's on top of the controversy previously mentioned.  It's an interesting company, historically, in terms of their (failed) role in the development of original online content and the dot com bust. JSFarman (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  04:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  04:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep now mostly remembered as a dot-com era flop, but in its day it was one of the main attempts to start a TV-style video network online, and it got considerable press at the time for it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica (₵) 04:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NTEMP. VMS Mosaic (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.