Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Lexicography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Digital Lexicography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not clear how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks references to coverage in 3rd party sources. Google news and web searches bring up nothing significant on the article title. RadioFan (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Barely intelligible vanity page apparently meant to promote someone's online business: Digital Lexicography Created(Circa 1999), in Leeds, Created by Martin Hare the Costing modeller, VBA Programmer/ Excel Modeller Martin Hare ... In 1999 Martin Hare with knowledge of Visual Basic for Applications and Excel produced the "Digital Lexicography" methodology, this has been used for many checking and testing environments. He does seem rather eager to get credit for this.  The concept of digital lexicography may support an article, but this is about somebody's minor tech business or pet project. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not explain concept, and seems more about a company than about a concept. Also, you might want to take a look at Martin Hare. The page was done by the same person. The article seems to capitalise on Martin Hare being the creator.  Guan long   wucaii  16:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I went and proposed Martin Hare for deletion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, that prod was removed so I created an AFD for that article as well, you may want to comment: Articles for deletion/Martin Hare--RadioFan (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.