Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Music News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn, no support for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Digital Music News

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a terribly written article that fails WP:NCORP. Despite the large number of references, it's basically all WP:REFSPAM, where DMN is passingly mentioned, but there is no significant coverage. There is no in-depth coverage as far as I can see. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Withdraw I intend to cleanup this article once this AfD is closed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Music,  and United States of America. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Yes, the article is written badly (sorry Pi314m, but your prose almost reads like a punched card). While someone really needs to come in with a shovel and remove all of the WP:REFBOMBing, WP:NCORP says, ... please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment .... From sources like NPR and The Atlantic it seems that this outlet led by Paul Resnikoff has indeed been able to do things like persuading streaming platforms to excise certain content from their platforms, with all of the cultural fallout that entails. I would argue that this coverage has been borderline significant, since they seem to attach weight to what the owner of this outlet thinks and has accomplished. I can't check the NYT refs, so I don't know to what extent they are passing references, as is Newsweek, but I assume that this is just enough for a WP:NBASIC profile.  Stony Brook  babble 01:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - the references on the article show the subject does indeed have some notability. - Indefensible (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: From the sources provided here, this subject clearly does pass WP:BASIC. User:Let'srun 20:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep but needs an ambitious editor to cleanup the machine gun prose. See WP:OVERCITE Lightburst (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.