Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital citizenship (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Etiquette (technology). Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Digital citizenship
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original research with an agenda. Was deleted in 2008 Articles_for_deletion/Digital_citizenship for the same reason. Runarb (talk) 23:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The AfD wasn't properly done, so I'm fixing this for the nominator. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'm finding that this term has been mentioned in various places since the late 90s, but I'm not sure that we need a specific separate page for this. I'm leaning towards merging this with Etiquette (technology), as the basic definition of the term as it stands now is more of a rephrasing of netiquette. It's not a perfect synonym, as the term also describes the basic state of being online with other users, so it could be merged elsewhere if there's a better target. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: This pages has gone through a very good rewrite by Tokyogirl79, so my original objections to it may not longer be valid as the page stands now. Runarb (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Etiquette (technology). Strangely, I don't think I've ever heard of this term, and I thought that I was hip to internet neologisms.  Anyway, I suggest a merge with Netiquette, of which it seems to be a rephrasing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Etiquette (technology) as essentially the same thing. Ansh666 09:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm seeing significant secondary source coverage here. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect as above. Neutralitytalk 14:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.